Question
In Potomac Valley Orthopeadic Associates v. Maryland State Board of Physicians, the court upheld the State Board of Physician's interpretation of the Maryland self-referral prohibition.
In Potomac Valley Orthopeadic Associates v. Maryland State Board of Physicians, the court upheld the State Board of Physician's interpretation of the Maryland self-referral prohibition. However, in the New Jersey Garcia and Endo Surgi cases, both courts rejected the NJ Board of Medical Examiner's interpretation of the Codey Law.
Can these cases can be reconciled with one another?
Should the courts should be deferential to regulatory interpretations of state self-referral prohibitions?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started
Business Law Text and Cases
Authors: Kenneth W. Clarkson, Roger LeRoy Miller, Gaylord A. Jentz, F
11th Edition
324655223, 978-0324655223
