In relation to the below link regarding ''Going with the Flow: Agile Development at Dell" and using the major guidelines stated below please provide a written report on

1. useful practical recommendations -following principles from PM theory- on what the company/organization should do next.

and using the guidelines the aim is to answer the question:

2. Should this project have a chance to start all over again?

3. What would you do differently?

See link to the case and major guidelines below

• https://www.studocu.com/en-us/document/california-state-university-chico/project-management/agile-dev-at-dell-decrypted/33783052
• You need AT LEAST four citations that enhance your arguments from scholarly sources.

MAJOR GUIDELINES TO USE IN SUCCESSFULLY SOLVING THE CHALLENGE

• You are also expected to perform calculations, as the one covered in the Project Management or Financial Management courses, where necessary. This includes, but not limited to:
  • CPM and Project Crashing
  • Project Selection through NPVs
  • Project Selection through EMV
• You are also expected to apply the theoretical frameworks covered in the Project Management course, where applicable. Including, but not limited to:
  • Project portfolio
  • Project aligment with the overall organizational strategy
  • PM Triangle
  • Project planning and control: scoping, scope creep, gold platting,WBS, timing, budget and quality, CPI
  • Risk identification and management
  • Project methodologies: Agile vs. Waterfall
  • Leadership and management from the project management and the sponsor
• You are also expected to apply the theoretical frameworks indirectly coved in the PM course, mainly covered in the Change Management course, where applicable. Including, but not limited to:
  • Stakeholder identification
  • Stakeholder engagement
  • Stakeholder management
  • Stakeholder communication plan
• Do use references and citations that are adequate. Ensure that you do NOT reuse material that others already prepared or compiled.
• I.e. this is NOT about looking up the work others have done before you and you preparing a summary or paraphrasing their analysis.
• Include any tables, images, charts, appendices, and similar as needed, in order to help support your arguments. These do not count as part of the word count specified above.
• Feel free to bring other business cases to support your argument. Either from publicly known projects or from your own experience. If you choose to do the latter, be sure to offer enough context for the reader to understand the type of project and its scope, and be detailed in offering why is a good example to illustrate your point.
• provide useful practical recommendations -following principles from PM theory- on what the company/organization should do next. For one-off projects, aim to answer the question: Should this project have a chance to start all over again, what would you do differently?