Question
In S v Ndebele and others 2012 (1) SACR 245 (GSJ) the accused were found guilty of theft of electricity, even though the crime of
In S v Ndebele and others 2012 (1) SACR 245 (GSJ) the accused were found guilty of theft of electricity, even though the crime of theft provides that intangible things (things that cannot be touched) cannot be stolen (theft of money in the form of credit is an exception to this rule). What is the danger with the verdict in Ndebele?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started
Criminal Behavior A Psychological Approach
Authors: Curt R. Bartol, Anne M. Bartol
10th edition
132973197, 978-0133140781, 133140784, 978-0132973199
