In September 2021, Justin, an aspiring professor, applied to work at Orange University (OU) in their Media department. After interviewing, OU determined that Justin met all of the qualications for the position and offered him a salary of $85,000 per year with medical benets and a start date of Spring Semester 2022. Justin's responsibilities would be to design a new, original course entitled \"Media Management", which focuses on introducing students to careers in Entertainment and creating all assignments for evaluation. Since Justin had additional qualications than what was required by OU (an advanced masters in law degree called an LLM), he wrote the school back and requested that he receive a starting salary of $95,000. The school's contract, when sent over, still had $85,000 listed as his salary. He also wrote in the margins \"Vacation: 2 weeks, paid\1) Introduction/Law [5 points]: A) What is the definition of a contract (1 point)? B) What law applies (CL or UCC) (1 point)? C) Which party has the burden of proof (1 point)? D) What is the standard of proof (POE or BRD) (1 point)? E) What elements are required to form a contract (1 point)? 2) Arguments [6 points]: A) What is Justin's best legal arguments as to why there is a contract? (3 points) B) What are OU's best legal defenses as to why there is not a contract? (3 points) 3) Conclusion [3 points]: A) If you are the judge in this case, who wins and why? (2 points) B) Other than suing OU, is there anyone else who Justin should sue? (1 point)