In the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis, Russel Norman (RN) suggested that the Reserve Bank of New Zealand should print money (lower the interest rate) in order to devalue the currency and increase output. Don Brash (DB), a former governor of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, countered that they should only print money if the government simultaneously cut spending. Explain in turn the likely impact of each of their suggestions and comment on the implied differences in their views on the state of the economy (i.e. whether they assume NZ economy is at or below full employment).

I need two graphs - one for each of the policy prescriptions described above