Question
In the audit of accounts receivable (AR) at Charlotte Company Ltd (Charlotte) for the financial year ended 30 June 2021, the auditor is provided an
In the audit of accounts receivable (AR) at Charlotte Company Ltd (Charlotte) for the financial year ended 30 June 2021, the auditor is provided an aged trial balance listing all customers with the corresponding amount owed to Charlotte at the end of the year, as presented in columns (1) and (2) in the Table below). Auditors have selected some customers and sent confirmation letters to each of those selected. The amount confirmed by each customer is presented in columns (3) in the Table below. All amounts are in $.
Customer
| Amount recorded on | Amount confirmed |
(1) | AR aged trial balance (2) | By customers (3) |
Baseline Ltd | 70,500 | 70,500 |
Surry Hills Corporation | 201,550 | 201,550 |
Parkmore Pty Ltd | 83,460 | 83,460 |
Hillside Institute | 325,500 | 300,000 |
Hung Long Partnership | 356,000 | 356,000 |
Sydney Co. | 600,000 | 600,000 |
Mr. Abbott | 68,600 | 68,600 |
Victoria Medical Centre | 615,000 | 615,000 |
Additional information:
- The auditor satisfies with all balances, except for the balance owed by Hillside Institute. Hillside Institute has indicated in its response that it had returned goods valued at $25,500 to Charlotte by 30 June 2021, due to a wrong type of goods sent to Hillsides on 5 June 2021.
Required:
(a) State the audit objective (or assertion) that the auditor would like to confirm for the AR account based on his audit procedure. (1 mark)
(b) Some people think that the audit procedure performed by the auditor is a test of control. Present your idea and argument to support your answer. (Limit your answer to 20 words). (1 mark)
(c) You are asked to review the audit findings and suggest the appropriate type of auditors opinion in this circumstance. You discuss with Charlotte about the dispute over Hillside response and Charlottes CFO admitted that Charlotte received the goods returned by Hillsides on 29 June 2021, however the accountant recorded this transaction on 1 July 2021. State action (if any) and the auditors opinion if the auditor-in-charge has set a materiality level of $28,000 for the AR account, given that there is no other misstatement discovered? (Limit your answer to 30 words).
(d) Will your answer to (c) be different if the auditor-in-charge has set a materiality level of $24,000 for the AR account? State action (if any) and the auditors opinion in this scenario. (Limit your answer to 40 words).
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started