In the case in the text,Browning v. Poirier, the court held that:

Group of answer choices

A. Poirier was entitled to a judgment in her favor because the statute of frauds required the agreement to be in writing.

B. Poirier was entitled to a judgment in her favor because evidence showed that Browning did not contribute to the purchase of the winning lottery ticket.

C. Browning was entitled to judgment in his favor because the agreement was to continue as long as the parties were involved in a romantic relationship.

D. Browning was entitled to judgment in his favor because the statute of frauds did not require the agreement to be in writing.