In the case in the text, Zelnick v$.$ Adams, $606$ S$.$E$.2$d $843($Virginia Sup. Ct$.2009),$ why did the court decide legal services were not necessary for the minor$$s $$position and condition$$ under the circumstances?

The minor had parents willing and able to pay legal fees.

Any interest the minor had in the trust would not be realized for many years.

The evidence was clear that the minor did not have a claim against the trust.

There were other methods of relief for the minor instead of costly legal action.