Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

In the case Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc. in 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution required a warrant

In the caseMarshall v. Barlow's, Inc.in 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution required a warrant for a nonconsensual OSHA inspection. Changes to 29 CFR 1903.4 allows OSHA to obtain warrants without the owner's knowledge under appropriate circumstances, which allows inspections to proceed without advance warning. However, in cases where OSHA shows up at a facility with no prior notice and does not obtain a warrant on an ex parte basis, the owner may require a warrant to be obtained prior to allowing an inspection to occur. Some companies have standing rules to require warrants for all inspections.

Discuss the positive and negative aspects of requiring a warrant prior to allowing any OSHA inspection to occur at a facility

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Constitutional Law For A Changing America Institutional Powers And Constraints

Authors: Lee J. Epstein, Kevin T. McGuire, Thomas G. Walker

11th Edition

1071822128, 978-1071822128

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Do not go, wait until I come

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Pay him, do not wait until I sign

Answered: 1 week ago