In the case of Case v. Sink & Rise, Inc., which of the following is correct? a. The stock owned by tenancy by the entirety did not count for a quorum because both James Caleb Case and Shirley Case were legally required to be present at the shareholders meeting b. The stock owned by tenancy by the entirety did not count for a quorum because James Caleb Case was present at the shareholders meeting, and it was not necessary for Shirley Case to be present. c. James Caleb Case could have legally voted the shares owned by tenancy by the entirety even though Shirley Case was not present at the shareholders meeting d. James Caleb Case voted the shares on which he had proxies because the shareholders who owned those shares were not present. e. None of the other choices are correct