In the case of Fishery Products International v$.$ Midland, the carrier:

O a$.$ Was held liable because political protests are not covered under the Queen's or public enemies, riots

or strikes exemption

$$ b$.$ Was not held because political protests are covered under the Queen's or public enemies, riots or strikes exemption

$$ c$.$ Was not held liable to due inherent ice or defect in the goods

$$ d$.$ Was not held liable due to an Act of God