Question
In the case of Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne, which of the following statements is untrue? Group of answer choices Horne's company was held
In the case of Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne, which of the following statements is untrue?
Group of answer choices
Horne's company was held to be subject to the same contractual provisions as Horne was himself
The decision in Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne was overruled by the Supreme Court in Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd
Horne's company was held by the court to be a sham company
The case is an example of piercing the veil of incorporation
What is meant by lifting the "veil of incorporation"? (Tick all that apply)
Group of answer choices
The separation of the personality of the company from its members is not to be maintained
Ignoring the fact that an act has been performed by a company the courts may look at the actions of the company officers.
An artificial person is not capable of doing anything illegal or fraudulent
Where a company may have been formed to avoid a legal liability, the courts may look at the true intention of those involved.
How do Dignam & Lowry interpret veil lifting? Tick all that apply
Group of answer choices
The Salomon era
Back to basics (1989 - present)
Interventionist period (1966-1989)
Classic era (1897-1966)
The judgment in Salomon v A Salomon Co Ltd dominated during the classic period
Group of answer choices
True
False
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started