in the case of Puncak Niaga (M) Sdn. Bhd. v. NZ wheels Sdn. Bhd. [2012] 1 MLJ 27, the court of Appeal held that "and, notwithstanding that the plaintiff appellant's relief against the first defendant respondent was made pursuant to the provisions of the consumer protection Act 1999, we were satisfied that the plaintiff appellant had established through affidavit evidence that the Mercedes Benz Motor car was not in fact and in law of acceptable quality".

Analyze the decision of the Court of Appeal in the above said case?.

Business Law subject