In the case of Sherwood Design Services Ltd$.$ v$.872935$ Ontario Ltd$.($Check the true statement$)$:

a$.$

The promoters' lawyer sent a letter to the plaintiff that stated that the numbered corporation "has been assigned $...$ as the corporation that will complete the $...$ purchase" but subsequently persons other than the promoters became shareholders.

b$.$

The lawyer's letter did not affect whether or not the corporation adopted the pre$-$incorporation contract because the promoters never signed the corporation's documents.

c$.$

Three individual promoters were shareholders of $872935$ Ontario Ltd$.$ at all relevant time.

d$.$

The case involved a purchase and sale agreement where Sherwood Design Services Inc. was the buyer.