In the case of the previous question $($ fireworks $,$ ?explosives etc. $),$ ?what defense can a person performing one of those acts use to show they are not liable for damages that might be caused?

A $.$

That the risk was foreseeable and there was no proximate cause

B $.$

That they knew of the danger, had an opportunity to opt out, but participated anyway

C $.$

The $$ reasonable person $$ ?standard was breached by bystanders in the area of the activity

D $.$

The manufacturer is always strictly liable

E $.$

They are defenseless because of their actions