.In the case ofGriswold v. Connecticutthe Supreme Court of the United States was asked to rule on Connecticut's law banning contraceptives. What was their holding?

1. They found that reproductive health fell within the "zone of privacy" under the Constitution. Consequently, they held that Connecticut's law unconstitutional and abolished all contraceptive and voluntary sterilization bans.

1. They found that reproductive health fell within the "police power" of the State under the Constitution. Consequently, they held that Connecticut's law was constitutional and permitted contraceptive and voluntary sterilization bans.

1. The found that reproductive health fell within the doctrine of "stare decisis." Consequently, they held that whether contraceptives and voluntary sterilization bans were legal was an issue for future courts to decide.

1. They found that reproductive health fell within the "ink blot" of the ninth amendment. Consequently, they held that the issue of contraceptives and voluntary sterilization bans fell entirely within the purview of the States.

2.What social priority were involuntary sterilization statutes passed to accomplish?

	Government reform
		Police enforcement
		Limiting sexually transmitted disease
		Eugenics

3. InBuck v. Bellthe Supreme Court held that involuntary sterilization of "imbeciles" was ________.

1. Constitutional because of the drain they placed on society.

1. Constitutional because it was in their own best interest.

1. Unconstitutional because it infringed on their fundamental rights.

1. Unconstitutional because it violated the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process.

4I f a court today was considering the same issues, the holding inBuck v. Bellwould be considered ______ .

		Good law.Buck v. Bellhas never been overruled and therefore is binding precedent on current courts.
		Bad law. Though never technically overruled, later cases (especiallySkinner v. Oklahoma) establish reproduction as a fundamental right that rendersBuckobsolete.
		Bad law.Buck v. Bellwas overruled byGriswold v. Connecticut.
		Good law.Buck v. Bellwas upheld by later cases includingSkinner v. Oklahoma.

5. InDobbs v. Jackson Women's Health OrganizationabolishedRoe v. Wade, ending the doctrine that had held that a federal constitutional right to abortion existed. What was the primary grounds the Court used in overrulingRoe?

		Abortion is counter to the inherent dignity of potential human life.
		The right to abortion is not deeply rooted in American history and tradition
		Abortion violates principles of fundamental ethics.
		The right to abortion is not necessary to ordered liberty.