In the case provided, Courts Appliances Ltd is facing a legal issue initiated by Rose Gill, who suffered injuries allegedly because of a defective Magic Box purchased from the defendant's store. The Claimant's Statement of Claim accuses Courts Appliances Ltd of negligence in the design, development, and manufacture of the product, resulting in severe injuries and financial loss. However, Ms. Banks, the Managing Director of Courts Appliances Ltd, asserts that the product underwent thorough testing by both regulatory bodies and the company's engineers, and any malfunctions were attributed to the claimant's misuse.This analysis will utilize the IRAC method of law to address the legal issues presented in the case involving Courts Appliances Ltd and the claim brought by Rose Gill. The focus will be on providing advice to Ms. Banks, the Managing Director of Courts Appliances Ltd, on the company's potential defence against the claim and how to approach the default judgment entered against the company. The discussion will be structured using the IRAC method to assess the relevant legal principles, apply them to the facts of the case, and provide a conclusion with recommendations for Ms. Banks.In the case provided, Courts Appliances Ltd is facing a legal issue initiated by Rose Gill, who suffered injuries allegedly because of a defective Magic Box purchased from the defendant's store. The Claimant's Statement of Claim accuses Courts Appliances Ltd of negligence in the design, development, and manufacture of the product, resulting in severe injuries and financial loss. However, Ms. Banks, the Managing Director of Courts Appliances Ltd, asserts that the product underwent thorough testing by both regulatory bodies and the company's engineers, and any malfunctions were attributed to the claimant's misuse.This analysis will utilize the IRAC method of law to address the legal issues presented in the case involving Courts Appliances Ltd and the claim brought by Rose Gill. The focus will be on providing advice to Ms. Banks, the Managing Director of Courts Appliances Ltd, on the company's potential defence against the claim and how to approach the default judgment entered against the company. The discussion will be structured using the IRAC method to assess the relevant legal principles, apply them to the facts of the case, and provide a conclusion with recommendations for Ms. Banks. based on the introduction the issue for this question is Can Courts Appliances Ltd challenge or set aside the default judgment entered against them for failing to respond to the claim form within the required timeframe? i need you to assist in writing the rule which should come from this Jamaica Civil Procedure Rules 2015 Part 13, Rule 13.3 . Also provide case law that i can also used in the rule. IRAC Method of law