In the cases in which school districts have prevailed in choosing more restrictive placements for students with disabilities, Daniel R.R. v. El Paso (1989), Clyde K. v. Puyallup School District (1994), and Hartmann v. Loudoun County Board of Education (1997), what practices did the districts follow that made a positive outcome more likely? What implications can be drawn from these cases to help school districts make educational meaningful and legally correct decisions today regarding LRE