In the Chevron case, the Supreme Court (check all that apply) Question 46 options: Told lower courts that when they review an agency's interpretation of a statute, they must first ask whether the statute is silent or ambiguous on the precise question arising in the case. Told lower courts that if the statute is clear, then that is the end of the matter, the court must apply the statute to the case regardless of the agency's interpretation. Said the fact an agency will have applied its expertise to the technical and complex statutory scheme justified the court deferring to the agency's interpretation where the statute is silent or ambiguous on the precise matter at issue. Said deference to the agency where Congress has been silent or vague is justified by the political accountability of the agency to the "Chief Executive,", the President