In the context of the Automobili Lamborghini S$.$P$.$A$.$ v Lamborghini Latino America USA case, why were the defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction denied?

a$.$ Because the two products sold by Garcia and Crudup through the website were purchased by private investigators hired by the plaintiffs

b$.$ Because Garcia personally and substantially participated in marketing and selling products into the United States through the website

c$.$ Because the only confirmed sales made by Garcia and Crudup through the website were to purchasers in South America

d$.$ Because Garcia's participation in the operation of the website was too limited to connect him to the marketing and sale of products into the United States