In the decision by the Supreme Court in Miglin v. Miglin, the court indicated that while judges should be reluctant to overturn private agreements regarding support payments, there could be circumstances in which it is legitimate to do so. The circumstance they outlined were --mmm- a) the marriage was; first, of a long duration, and second, the agreed upon support payment was later deemed to be insufficient. b) a significant and unforeseen change in the parties financial circumstances. O c) while the divorce occurred prior to the 1985 changed to the Divorce Act, the marriage occurred prior to this act being legislated. d) no change to support payments should ever occur