In "The Dissenting Opinion," former Canadian Supreme Court Justice Claire

L'Heureux-Dub argues that dissenting judicial opinions are positive. However, some courts (like the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in the United Kingdom) and some entire legal traditions (like civil law courts in France) do not support the idea that judges should be able to dissent. What do you think: are dissenting judicial opinions a positive feature of the courts, or are they something courts should do away with? In either case, explain why? give an example from a court decision and rely primarily on an external academic source, with one from 2023, to substantiate your position. use in text citations and references