In the early 1970s, Kate Fulleropened an account at Tulip WholesaleFlorist, Inc., to purchase flowers and florist supplies for her flower shop, called Bountiful BeautyFlower Shop, which she operated as a sole proprietorship. In 1983, the flower shop was incorporated as Bountiful BeautyFlower Shop, Inc.Fullercontinued to order supplies from Tulip, as did her son when he began to manage the day-to-day operations of the shop during the 1990s. Tulip, which had no knowledge that Bountiful Beautywas now a corporation, sued Fullerand her son personally to recover a balance owing on the Bountiful Beautyaccount (for purchases made after Bountiful Beauty had incorporated). Is the fact that Tulip was never informed of the subsequent incorporation of the Bountiful Beauty Shop a sufficient ground for piercing the corporate veil and holdingFullerand her son personally liable for the debt? Explain.