In the following, identify whether each party mentioned committed a criminal act; if so, whether that party's intent was general or specific under common law standards; and whether the intent would be considered purpose, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence under the Model Penal Code.

ASSIGNMENT 15.2 In the following situation, identify (1) whether each party mentioned committed a criminal act; if so, (2) whether that party's intent was general or specific under common law standards; and (3) whether the intent would be considered purpose, knowledge, recklessness, or negligence under the Model Penal Code. Cameron, Connelly, Rheatta, and Shanda headed directly at the young man, whose shared an apartment during college. One back was to the car. Cameron struck the night they decided to go out clubbing. young man at a speed of more than 40 miles Cameron drove Shanda's car. All had been per hour. Rheatta said they should go back, drinking heavily for several hours when but Shanda urged Cameron to keep going. they headed for home. Cameron spotted a Connelly told Cameron to pull over. Cam- young man on a sidewalk whom Cameron eron did, and Connelly got into the driver's had never liked. He suspected that the seat and drove the car home. No one in the young man was responsible for Cameron's group ever stopped or called for help. The having been caught cheating on a test. As young man bled to death as he lay in the a result of being caught, Cameron had to street; it was several hours before he was repeat the course and would not graduate found. Shanda parked the car in a rented on time. Connelly saw the young man and storage garage for several months and then suggested that they scare him by driving drove it out of state to her home, where she up onto the curb. Rheatta and Shanda said filed an insurance claim alleging that she nothing. Cameron accelerated the car and had struck a deer