In the Johns Manville asbestos litigation, Sam- W uel Greenstone, an attorney for 11 asbestos workers, settled their claims for $30,000 and a promise that he would not directly or indirectly participate in the bringing of new actions against the Corporation." The 1933 case settlement was documented in the minutes of Johns Manville's board meeting, Could the informa- tion in the minutes be used in later litigation against Johns Manville? How could a plaintiff's attorney obtain the information? Do you feel Mr, Greenstone made an ethical decision in his agreement? Wasn't his loy- alty to his 11 clients and his obligation to obtain com- pensation for them? Would you have agreed to the no-further-participation-in-a-lawsuit clause? Would you, if you had been an executive at Johns-Manville, have supported the clause