In the late $1990$s$,$ a college student created a computer program called Sharester, a peer$-$to$-$peer music sharing service allowing users to download MP$3$ files for free without paying for the music. Musical artists were upset that fans could obtain their music without paying for it first. A major record label, Big Name Music, representing various musical artists around the world, filed a lawsuit against Sharester.

What laws could Big Name Music claim that Sharester violated?

Apply the cause of action you identified when answering the previous question to the hypothetical.

Is Sharester likely to defend itself successfully? Why or why not?

What could Sharester have done to avoid being sued?