Question
In the late 1990s, car leasing was very popular in the United States. A customer would lease a car from the manufacturer for a set
In the late 1990s, car leasing was very popular in the United States. A customer would lease a car from the manufacturer for a set term, usually two years, and then have the option of keeping the car. If the customer decided to keep the car, the customer would pay a price to the manufacturer, the "residual value," computed as 60% of the new car price. The manufacturer would then sell the returned cars at auction. In 1999, manufacturers lost an average of $480 on each returned car (the auction price was, on average, $480 less than the residual value).Suppose two customers have leased cars from a manufacturer. Their lease agreements are up, and they are considering whether to keep (and purchase at 60% of the new car price) their cars or return their cars. Two years ago, Clancy leased a car that was valued new at $16,500. If he returns the car, the manufacturer could likely get $8,250 at auction for the car. Becky also leased a car, valued new at $17,500, two years ago. If she returns the car, the manufacturer could likely get $12,250 at auction for the car.
Use the following table to indicate whether each buyer is more likely to purchase or return the car.
Buyer | Keep and Purchase Car | Return Car |
---|---|---|
Becky | ||
Clancy |
The manufacturer will lose money (at auction, relative to the residual value of the car) if returns the car instead of keeping and purchasing it.
True or False: Setting a more accurate residual price of each car would help attenuate the problems of adverse selection.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started