In the lecture, Professor Xavier described steady states as "horrible places to be." Was this claim absolute or relative? Do countries having steady states that are lower in the capital have worse living qualities? b) Imagine a world where there are "n" countries with different levels of capital, k. They all share the same saving level, birth rate, and the same GDP per capita function. The only thing that differs is their depreciation rate. In this world, how does the distribution of income in the short term and long term look like? Think about the shape it would take