In the prosecution of Bobby for a murder that took place in Maryland, he claims that he was in Florida on the day of the murder. To prove that Bobby was in Maryland the day of the murder, the prosecution calls police officer (PO) Todd as a witness at trial and asks him whether he saw Bobby on the date of the murder. PO Todd states that he can't remember. The prosecution shows PO Todd a speeding ticket he issued to Bobby that day, and asks if he now recalls seeing Bobby in Maryland on that date. PO Todd says that he still can't recall. PO Todd then testifies that he gave one speeding ticket on the date in question, that he wrote the ticket as he was talking to the person to whom it was issued, and that he issued it to the name that appeared on the driver's license the person showed him, and that he recorded the information correctly. Bobby's name appears on the ticket.

The prosecution asks PO Todd to read aloud the name on the ticket.

Which of the following arguments most strongly supports Bobby's argument for exclusion of the evidence?

	A.	The ticket is inadmissible hearsay within hearsay.
	B.	The ticket is inadmissible because it does not satisfy the requirements of any hearsay exception.
	C.	The ticket is inadmissible because its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.
	D.	Even though the ticket satisfies the hearsay exception for recorded recollection, it should be excluded to effectuate the policy of the rule excluding certain public records when offered against criminal defendants.