In the Qui Tam case

Listen to the oral arguments before the Supreme court.

In the supreme court of the United States Universal Health Services Inc. Petitioner NO 15-7 Vs United States And Massachusetts, EX REL, Julio Escobar And Carmen Correa.

1 Identify the arguments for and against limiting the scope of liability under the False Claims Act in a recent case: University Health Services, in Vs Escobar.

2 Compare and contrast the arguments of all parties to the action, including the solicitor general on the viability of the implied theory and the proper scope of the implied theory of liability under the False Claims Act.

3 Based upon the questions from the court, identify whether the court appears to be leaning toward a particular outcome in the case and why.

4 After articulating the arguments in the Escobar case, compare and contrast those arguments to the arguments made in the court decisions.

List references and sources to compare with.