In the reading, Ricardo Lagos, Heraldo Muoz and Anne-Marie Slaughter (1999), "The Pinochet Dilemma," Foreign Policy: 26-39., Why was it major international news when British police officers arrested the former dictator of Chile, Augusto Pinochet? What potential consequences for this action did some fear? How do the authors draw connections between increasing "globalization" and the events in Chile - both its democratization, and the criminal prosecution of its former dictator? What are some important distinctions between international tribunals like those for Nuremberg, Tokyo, Rwanda, and the former Yugoslavia, and the criminal prosecution of Augusto Pinochet here? Why might it make sense to offer dictators "an explicit guarantee of immunity" in exchange for either stepping down or allowing a democratic transition? To what extent was this immunity granted to Pinochet in Chile?