In the recent past, the NYPD was found, by a Federal judge, to be abusing stop and frisk processes. Basically, citizens were being stopped and then frisked in a proactive manner that the judge deemed to be beyond the allowable scope ofTerry vs. Ohio.Without having to conduct a search about the NYC case, just think about what that might look like? What was the decision inTerry v. Ohio? How might police officers sometimes overstep this Supreme Court decision? Examine the cases about stop and frisk that have been decided by the Supreme Court since theTerrydecision. Where are we when it comes to what the Court is now saying about how stop and frisk must be used by police officers?