In the spring of 1995, the plaintiff Mr. Digger had meetings with Mr. and Mrs. O'Dell, the defendants, at their vacant rural property to discuss the drilling of a water well. At this meeting the location for the well was decided upon. While at the meeting, a preprinted Work Order with various blanks (including a price), was completed by Mr. Digger and signed by Mrs. O'Dell. In addition to filling in the blanks on the preprinted form, the form, which had a heading of "Work Order" had the word "Quotation" added to it after the words "Work Order". The word "Quotation" was added at the insistence of Mrs. O'Dell who was not prepared to sign the document unless that word was added, as she intended to obtain another quote. Immediately above where Mrs. O'Dell signed the document were the words "Authorized by:". Shortly after the document was signed by Mrs. O'Dell and Mr. Digger, Mr. Digger went to work at drilling the well, completing it shortly thereafter. At the time the well was drilled, there were no residences on the land. Mr. Digger prepared an invoice dated May 2, 1995 for the amount due and owing for the well drilling job. Most of the writing on the invoice was Mr. Digger's, but Mr. O'Dell wrote in his name and address at the top of the document. A $2000.00 amount was paid by Mr. O'Dell on June 16, 1995, but no more. Mr. Digger sued the O'Dells for the balance owing and Mr. and Mrs. O'Dell dispute the claim alleging there was no contract entered into. 1. What is the main legal issue? ( 2 marks) 2. What is the legal test (rule of law) used by the courts? ( 1 mark) 3. Develop a logical argument for the plaintiff, applying the rule of law to the facts? ( 1 mark) 4. Develop a logical argument for the defendants, applying the rule of law to the facts (1 mark) Ff i - B I IE