In the Supreme Court of Canada case of R. v. J.A., the Court dealt with a situation where person A engaged in sexual activity with person B after person B had passed out, and person A relied on consent given by person B while person B was conscious. The Court ruled that... ("7, Person B's consent remains valid after person B passes out, and person A may engage in any sexual activity that he wants with person B while person B is unconscious. ("3, If person A relies on person B's consent, given while conscious, and engages in sexual activity with person B while person B is unconscious, person A is not guilty of Sexual Assault but is guilty of Assault. ("3, Person A may NOT rely on consent given while person B was conscious, and any x. I sexual activity that person A engages in with person B while person B is unconscious amounts to a Sexual Assault. ("*3 Person B's consent remains valid after person B passes out, and person A may N. ' engage in sexual activity with person B while person B is unconscious, but only the sexual activity that person B consented to while conscious. Question 19 (3 points) Aside from murder cases, when a person has the mens rea for offence "A" and commits the the actus reus for offence "B", (choose one) O He will be found guilty of attempting offence "B". O He will be found guilty of offence "B" He will be found guilty of offence "A". O He will be found guilty of attempting offence "A". O He will be acquitted entirely.Question 2 (3 points} According to the Ontario Court of Appeal in R. v. Alicandro, where the accused was charged with luring a child on the internet, but the "child" was actually an adult police officer pretending to be a child... ("'1' ...the fact that the \"child\" was actually an adult did NOT give Alicandro a ' defence. (""3 ...the fact that the \"child\" was actually an adult gave Alicandro a defence, on the basis of "legal impossibility". ("'3 ...Alicandro was acquitted on the basis that the police had engaged in "x / entrapment. (\"\"1 ...the fact that the \"child\" was actually an adult gave Alicandro a defence, on the '2 basis of "factual impossibility"