Question
In the Zeidan et al. (2010) article on page 601, it states the following: Results 5.1. Self-report measures Table 2 reports the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory
In the Zeidan et al. (2010) article on page 601, it states the following: Results 5.1. Self-report measures Table 2 reports the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory and Profile of Mood States data for each group across sessions. The analysis on the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory scores showed that brief MM training was effective at increasing mindfulness skills when compared to controls. There was a group by session interaction, F(1, 47) = 5.73, p = .02, n2 = .11, and an effect of session, F(1, 47) = 13.18, p = .001, n2 = .22; but no effect of group, F < 1. In this analysis, there was a __________________ interaction, a _________________ main effect of session, and a __________________ main effect of group.
- A. significant, significant, significant
- B. non-significant, significant, significant
- C. significant, non-significant, significant
- D. significant, significant, non-significant
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started