In this activity, you will work on the second part of the critical analysis of your technology's role in your event. You should consider the feedback from your instructor on the previous activity and use your responses to inform this assignment. Throughout the process, you will support your analysis with reliable evidence from varied sources, which will include two resources from the Module Resources sections of this course and two resources that you find through your own research using the Shapiro Library. For this activity, you will recommend strategies for how to address the limitations of technology and assess significant factors that could impact understanding the role of technology in this event. You will assess the benefits and challenges of critically analyzing technology in society. Finally, you will recommend strategies for using this kind of critical analysis for meeting your personal goals.

You are not required to answer each question below the rubric criteria, but you may use them to better understand the criteria and guide your thinking.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

1. Integrate reliable evidence from varied sources throughout your paper to support your analysis.
   1. It is important to draw from a diverse pool of perspectives from varied sources to support the analysis. This is different from the Citations and Attributions rubric criterion.
   2. Reliable evidence from varied sources should be interwoven throughout the paper itself, while citing and attributing sources will be represented as APA in-text citations and a reference list at the end of your work.
   3. You will be evaluated on both criteria.
2. Recommend strategies to address the limitations of the technology involved in the event.
   1. Think about the limitations of the technology influencing the event. What are some ways developers might solve the limitations of the technology?
3. Assess at least two significant factors that could impact how individuals understand the role of technology in the event, such as biases, beliefs, assumptions, and/or values.
   1. Consider how individuals understood the role of technology in the event. What biases, beliefs, assumptions, and/or values could shape their understanding of technology's role in the event?
4. Assess the benefits and challenges of critically analyzing technology in society.
   1. What may be the positive impact of critically analyzing technology in general? What are the more difficult aspects of addressing technology?
5. Recommend strategies for using this kind of critical analysis for meeting your personal goals.
   1. What might this look like in your everyday life? Consider how critically analyzing technology's influence on a particular event can be used to address day-to-day responsibilities.

Here is the first part

3D printing has had an impact across various industries. Its influence has been particularly pronounced during times of crisis, where its rapid production capabilities have proved invaluable. This analysis delves into the role of 3D printing in crisis scenarios through a social science lens exploring its effects on politics, communities, economies, and healthcare. It also delves into how societal norms have been influenced by this technology and highlights areas where improvements could be beneficial.

During crises such as COVID-19, 3D printing has brought about huge changes in many different fields. Governments have leveraged 3D printing to address shortages of supplies such as personal protective equipment (PPE) and components for ventilators. The swift manufacturing capabilities of 3D printing enabled the production of these items playing a role in managing the healthcare crisis effectively (Chia & Wu 2015). This highlighted the potential for 3D printing to enhance strategies for handling crises.

On a community level, 3D printing enables manufacturers and groups to contribute to relief efforts during crises. Makerspaces and enthusiasts worldwide mobilized to create PPE and other essential items fostering a sense of unity and resilience within communities (Tino et al., 2020). The united response provided aid and exemplified the potential of decentralized manufacturing to support communities during crises.

Economically, 3D printing has demonstrated its adaptability to supply chain disruptions. Unlike manufacturing that depends on global supply chains vulnerable to crisis, 3D printing's ability to produce items locally and on demand provides a more resilient option. During the coronavirus pandemic, Ford, General Motors, and other companies have repurposed their 3D printing facilities to create equipment to sustain economic activity and meet urgent medical needs (Ford Motor Company, 2020).

The incorporation of 3D printing in crisis management has also influenced social behaviors. Through efforts to build platforms for individuals to share and enhance open-source designs for medical devices, communication has changed (Prusa, 2020). This open-source culture fosters rapid sharing of innovation and solutions in emergencies. Additionally, as the Maker Movement embraces 3D printing to solve problems, cultural expressions are evolving. 3D printing now symbolizes creativity and resourcefulness reinforcing values of self-sufficiency and community assistance. Governance processes are influenced by policymakers' perception of the need to provide the necessary support. Regulate the utilization of 3D printing during emergencies to ensure the quality and safety of printed objects within healthcare environments. The adoption of 3D printing has also enabled prompt responses to medical requirements enhancing the quality of care and patient outcomes.

While there are advantages to printing technology, it is important to acknowledge its limitations that require careful consideration. One prominent constraint is the inconsistency in the quality of printed objects, which raises concerns about their reliability and safety (Mueller et al., 2020). It is imperative to establish a framework for ensuring quality assurance and certification processes so that all printed items adhere to standards. Furthermore, addressing the speed of 3D printing remains crucial in scenarios requiring large-scale production. Improvements in printing speeds and materials could increase the technology's ability to respond effectively to situations.

InConclusion, 3D printing has emerged as a valuable tool in crisis management influencing aspects such as politics, community dynamics, and economic factors. It has reshaped norms by fostering innovation, collaboration, and resilience. Overcoming challenges related to quality assurance measures and production efficiency is vital for maximizing its benefits. Through the advancement and improvement of 3D printing technology, society can effectively enhance its ability to respond to future crises.