In this case did the court make the right decision?

-I think this case being reversed was the right decision. Originally, the court made the Kidd's pay their old offer of $32,843 even after the arbitrator only awarded $25,069.47. I think it is the right choice that they reversed this and made it so that the $25,000 was awarded due to the fact that the Kidd's offer was no longer reasonable, nor was it still acceptable because a contract is also only open for a reasonable amount of time.

What do you think?