In Trouble. Bruno, an issuer of stock, may be in trouble. He sold stock in a new health club venture before the effective date of registration. He did so because he was in financial trouble involving other ventures of his and needed additional funds. Bruno thought that the health club venture would be such a success that he would never get caught in regard to the stock sale. Unfortunately, he was wrong. The health club venture was going very poorly and investors were looking for some way to hold Bruno responsible. Another problem Bruno has is that he inflated information regarding the prospects of the health club in the prospectus. Investors bitterly complained. Rick, a new lawyer, told Bruno that as far as he knew, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) could fine Bruno under the Securities Act of 1933 but could not send him to jail. Bruno told Rick that was good news and that no one should feel sorry for the investors because none of them made any effort to check on information contained in the prospectus or to investigate the future profitability of the health club venture. Bruno says that he plans to rely on the due diligence defense. Bruno also asks Rick if he is aware of any other defenses. Bruno says that he has never previously been in trouble with the SEC. Which of the following is true regarding Bruno's sale of securities before the effective date of registration?

Multiple Choice

• He will almost certainly be liable because the Securities Act of 1933 provides no defenses for that violation.
• He will be able to avoid liability if he can establish that the sales before the effective date did not directly result in any losses to investors.
• That is not a violation of the securities laws, so there is no question about liability.
• He will be able to avoid liability if he can establish the due diligence defense.
• He will be able to avoid liability if he can establish that the investors who purchased stock early were aware that the securities were sold before the effective date of registration.