In Uber v Heller, the Supreme Court of Canada held that the arbitration clause in the contract between Uber and Mr. Heller directing the parties to mediate and arbitrate in the Netherlands was... Select one: a. Unenforceable because the Netherlands does not use a common law system like Canada. b. Unenforceable because it was so unfair as to be unconscionable. c. In Mr. Heller's best interest, as the ADR process would remain confidential. d. A cheaper and more efficient option than going to court e. Fully enforceable, as private parties have absolute discretion when it comes to accepting and enforcing ADR clauses.