In Unit 2, you completed a matching activity where you identified the important components of a literature review that were located in the article, "Critical Thinking and Discussion Boards in Undergraduate Research Methods". For this matching activity, you will use the same article, but you will identify the important components of a discussion section located within the article. Read the discussion section (pp. 61-62) for the following article: Hartnett, J. L., & Edlund, J. E. (2020). Critical thinking and discussion boards in undergraduate research methods. Currents in Teaching & Learning, 12(1), 5664. Then, complete the following matching activity, where you will identify the following: o A restatement of the research findings. A discussion of how the results of this study are similar to, or contradict, the results of similar studies conducted by other researchers. o Limitations of the research study. Advice to fellow researchers about what studies should be conducted next on the research topic. You may complete this matching activity as many times as you would like until it is due. A Restatement of the Research Findings A Discussion of how the Results of this Study are Similar to, or Contradict, the Results of Similar Studies Conducted by Other Researchers Limitations of the Research Study Advice to Fellow Researchers About What Studies Should be Conducted Next on the Research Topic A. "...we think researchers should test these methods in courses outside of psychology. There are many similarities across academic disciplines in the methods employed and we believe it is quite likely that similar gains are likely. Finally, we believe researchers should test whether or not similar gains would be experienced by students in online or blended courses" (Hartnett & Endlund, 2022, p. 62). . B. "The current research studied critical thinking a small sample of students in a research methods class using sample of psychology students" (Hartnett & Endlund, 2020, p. 61" and "the lack of a control section that was exposed to the discussion content but not asked to discuss the discussion content" (Hartness & Endlund, 2020, p. 62). C. "We demonstrated that gains in critical thinking can be achieved We demonstrated that student comfort with critical thinking increases as the result of online discussion boards in the context of face-to-face research methods courses. Specifically, we demonstrated that students who completed the online discussion boards experienced objective gains in comfort with critical thinking abilities, which may encourage greater critical thinking in and outside of the classroom" (Hartnett & Edlund, 2020, p. 61). D. "Critical thinking has consistently been identified as a key issue in the training of undergraduate students (APA, 2013) and the teaching of critical thinking has often been identified as one of the most challenging tasks to accomplish in an undergraduate class (Connor-Greene, 2005). The exercise developed as part of this research improved critical thinking while not being perceived as a burden by the students (which in and of itself is an additional accomplishment)" (Hartnett & Edlund, 2022, p. 61).