1. InUnited States v. Schap, the principle issue was whether the facts amounted to premeditated murder or voluntary manslaughter. In most jurisdictions, the latter has a far lower maximum punishment. Is that appropriate? Explain, demonstrating your understanding of the relevant concepts from this lesson.

1. ReadIzell v. Union CarbideCorp.In terms of the legal system of torts, is it fair to hold Union Carbide liable when it could not be proved that it was Union Carbide's asbestos that caused the plaintiff's mesothelioma? What alternatives might there be? If you were constructing a system of products liability, how would you treat such cases?

1. If "a promise is a promise," why is it okay (or not okay) for courts to award compensatory damages for breach of contract claims rather than order specific performance?

pls cite all of these minimum word count for each question 300