In Week 1, I asked you to take a look at various Ethical frameworks. This week, let's try them out on the following scenario.

Imagine you are in charge of issuing contracts on behalf of your city or town. The biggest project out for bid right now is a bridge repair. You receive three bids; two are from contractors who have done successful repairs for you before, and the third is from a new company. The new company puts in a bid for 40-60% less than the other two companies. You call them to see if their bid is accurate (or too good to be true), and not only do they confirm it, they offer to give you a cash bribe for choosing their bid.

Under Kantianism, why would accepting the bribe (and the bid) be unjust? Explain using both of Kant's two categorical imperatives.

Under Utilitarianism, is it possible that accepting the bribe (and the bid) is just? Be sure to explain the pros and cons of the decision.

Under Social Contract, what social norms could apply in this situation? Which norms or rule do you think residents of the city or town WANT to apply?