In Wickard v$.$ Filburn, the federal government prohibited a farmer $($Filburn$)$ from growing grain on his own property for his own use. Based on our discussion in class, which side promotes constitutionally limitedgovernment$?$This meaning does not apply, because the U$.$S$.$ Constitution does not address this question. Wickard, because Article $1\mathrm{.}8$ gives Congress power to regulate non$-$commercial activity. Filburn, because Article I$\mathrm{.}8$ does not give Congress power to regulate non$-$commercial activity. Either Wickard or Filburn promotes constitutionally limited government.