In your predictive office memo, please address 3 questions: 1. Is the agreement to sell the Casper Parcel between BFS and Van Casper an agreement that falls within any of the categories of the Statute of Frauds? Fully explain your answer. 2. For this part only, assume that the agreement to sell the Casper Parcel between BFS and Van Casper is an agreement that is within the Statute of Frauds. Is the Statute of Frauds' writing requirement satisfied by any of the written documents described in the hypothetical? Fully explain your answer. Limit your discussion in this part to the written documents described in the hypothetical. 3. For this part only, assume that the agreement to sell the Casper Parcel between BFS and Van Casper is within the Statute of Frauds, and that none of the written documents referred to in the hypothetical satisfy the writing requirements of the Staute of Frauds. Does BFS have any other argument for enforcing the agreement against Van Casper? Fully explain your answer.