In your responses, comment on at least two of your peers' posts. Critique the arguments made in each peer's article by weighing the costs of FTAs against the benefits. Support your position with sources from the news or the textbook.

I came across a current article about the Australian prime minister who seeks to diversify trade and foreign investment partners; he feel as though the greater diversity in who they trade with, the greater variety in which they trade, which will make their economy more resilient and more secure. This article is supportive of FTA's because the article expresses how the two nations share rich history bound by their democratic values. There for it shows the growth in the trading relationship between Australia and India, which also shows the two countries' agreement when it comes to certain obligations that affect trade in goods and services.

How do I respond to this?