in.bc.ca/pluginfile.php/2061600/mod resource/content/3/Pirb %20v%20Singh pdf One day in October, 1999 Dr. Pirbhai told the owner of Sarwan Auto Sales and Bramptom Auto Collision Centre Ltd., Mr Singh, that he was interested in buying a used Lexus Singh attended at an auto auction business where he saw a 1998 lexus. He was given a damage inspection report stating that $24,900 in repairs were necessary. Singh called Dr. Pirbhai and told him that he had located a Lexus which was damaged but that he could bring it to showroom condition" for $5,000. On the auction day Dr. Pribal was not allowed inside the auction protocol) however he communicated with Singh by telephone. Singh successfully bid on the lexus. He told Dr. Pirbhai that he had paid $32,000. In fact he paid $27,000 and purchased a car for Mrs Singh for the sum of $5,000 Dr. Pirbhal initially gave Sine 55,000 for the repairs however, Singh demanded to more payments of $7,000 and $5,000 in November and Dr. Pribha paid. When Dr. Pirbhal went to pick up the car, Singh demanded a further $5,000 before he would release the car. Again Dr. Pirbhai paid. The repairs to this point totaled $22,000 Almost immediately Dr. Pihai noted that the car did not drive well. Dr. Pirbhal had it checked out by another auto repair shop and he was told that the car was not safe to drive. He demanded that Singh take back the car. Singh said that he would try to sell it for him. That did not happen and therefore Dr. Pitbhai retook possession and had repairs done at a cost of a further $15,000. Dr. Parbhalsed Singh 1. What is the legal issue 2. What is the rule of low here? 3. Argument for Dr. Phol? 4. Argument for Singh DW Prisen Home % 5 6 7 8 R. T Y U F G H K K in.bc.ca/pluginfile.php/2061600/mod resource/content/3/Pirb %20v%20Singh pdf One day in October, 1999 Dr. Pirbhai told the owner of Sarwan Auto Sales and Bramptom Auto Collision Centre Ltd., Mr Singh, that he was interested in buying a used Lexus Singh attended at an auto auction business where he saw a 1998 lexus. He was given a damage inspection report stating that $24,900 in repairs were necessary. Singh called Dr. Pirbhai and told him that he had located a Lexus which was damaged but that he could bring it to showroom condition" for $5,000. On the auction day Dr. Pribal was not allowed inside the auction protocol) however he communicated with Singh by telephone. Singh successfully bid on the lexus. He told Dr. Pirbhai that he had paid $32,000. In fact he paid $27,000 and purchased a car for Mrs Singh for the sum of $5,000 Dr. Pirbhal initially gave Sine 55,000 for the repairs however, Singh demanded to more payments of $7,000 and $5,000 in November and Dr. Pribha paid. When Dr. Pirbhal went to pick up the car, Singh demanded a further $5,000 before he would release the car. Again Dr. Pirbhai paid. The repairs to this point totaled $22,000 Almost immediately Dr. Pihai noted that the car did not drive well. Dr. Pirbhal had it checked out by another auto repair shop and he was told that the car was not safe to drive. He demanded that Singh take back the car. Singh said that he would try to sell it for him. That did not happen and therefore Dr. Pitbhai retook possession and had repairs done at a cost of a further $15,000. Dr. Parbhalsed Singh 1. What is the legal issue 2. What is the rule of low here? 3. Argument for Dr. Phol? 4. Argument for Singh DW Prisen Home % 5 6 7 8 R. T Y U F G H K K