Inciuded among the factors that atfect the productivity of camera

PATs and drone PATs are

the percentage use of overtime, the complexity of camera$/$drone designs $($as measured primarily by the number of components used in the assembly process$),$ the size of the company$-$paid fringe benefit package that each PAT member receives, cumulative $R$&$D$ expenditures for cameras$/$drones$,$ the number of different camera$/$drone models that have to be assembled, the hourly rates of overtime pay, and the percentage of the assembly process that is performed by robots.

the size of assembly quality incentives paid to camera$/$drone PATs, changes in the number of camera$/$drone product enhancements, the percentage of the assembly process that is performed by robots, hourly rates for overtime work, and the time PATs spend in making warrant repairs.

how the total compensation packages $($not including overtime pay$)$ of camera$/$drone PAT members compare to the all$-$company average compensation levels, how the total compensation of camera PATs compare against the total compensation paid to drone PATs, the size of assembly quality incentive payments, and the amount a company spends annually per camera$/$drone PAT on training and productivity$-$enhancing assembly techniques, post$-$assembly product testing, and ways to reduce warranty claims.

percentage increases in the annual base wage, the year$-$end bonuses paid to PAT members for perfect attendance, hourly overtime pay rates, the size of the percentage increases in company$-$paid fringe benefits package for PAT members, the total number of components used in assembling cameras$/$drones$,$ and the time PATs spend in making warranty repairs.