Inferential Analysis Review Worksheet Based on the Professional Development Opportunities: Full Report presentation showing a full report of the analysis of the Desirability Survey data, complete the table below in complete sentences to summarize and explain the following ideas from Slide 7 of the presentation. Column 1 lists each analysis component to review. In Column 2, document what was shared for each of the identified analysis components in the presentation. You may cut and paste. This part does not need to be in complete sentences. In Column 3, write a 25- to 50-word explanation about why the researcher made this choice (i.e., the relevance and importance of the statistical research). Use information from this week's videos and readings to support your answer. Explain your rationale. In Column 4, write a 25- to 50-word description of the meaning (interpretation) of the information. What might it tell you about the data? What might it tell you about manager and employee scores on the survey? Explain your rationale. Analysis Component What was shared about this in the presentation? Why did the researcher make this choice? What does the information mean? Dependent and independent variables The null hypothesis (Ho) The alternative hypothesis (H1) The results of analysis (reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis) Desirability Statistical Analysis: Inferential Question: Is desirability of professional development different between managers and employees? . . Ho: M-ME=0 H: UM-ME = 0 Non-directional (two tailed), independent samples t-test = 0.05, t = 2.01, df=48, p = 0.048 Reject the null hypothesis. Employee and manager desirability scores are different. Managers have greater desirability for professional development than employees.