Intact Rearranged New Correct

.53 .70 .70 .77 .68 .60 .88 .28 .65 .75 .63 .90 .78 1.00 1.00 .60 .88 1.00 .77 .88 1.00 .58 .63 .95 .68 .65 .75 .67 .88 1.00 .75 .85 1.00 .95 .93 1.00 .72 .90 1.00 .87 1.00 1.00 .75 .75 1.00 .82 .75 .95 .68 .40 .90 .77 .90 .95 .77 .83 .95 .65 .55 .40 .73 .73 .95 .83 .65 .90 .58 .50 .55 .92 .88 .90 .63 .91 .94 .63 .88 1.00 .72 .90 1.00 .42 .70 .90 .57 .48 .85 .82 .85 .95 .97 .98 1.00 .68 .58 .70 .62 .68 .80 .93 1.00 1.00 .73 .50 .65 .58 .88 .95 .52 .73 1.00 .43 .85 .95

In this experiment, individuals were tested on their ability to study pairs of words and then later recognize those word pairs. First, participants studied a list of words pairs like "summer-tomorrow", "tent-lawn", "tree-flower". Then, all participants completed a memory test. During this memory test, all participants were asked if they recognized three different types of word pairs. Some word pairs were intact (e.g., "summer-tomorrow"), some word pairs were rearranged ("tree-lawn"), and some word pairs were entirely new ("banana-table"). In order to give a correct answer, individuals would have to say "old" to the intact pair, and "new" to the rearranged or new pairs. The data set provides the proportion correct for each participant on each trial type. Was there an effect of pair type (intact, rearranged, new) on individuals' performance? Conduct the appropriate analysis and use it to complete the sentences below. A repeated-measures one-way ANOVA failed to show a statistically significant effect trial type on memory performance, _____ (you will fill in this last blank on the next question). Flag question: Question 2 Question 20.5 pts Provide the APA-style result for your analysis here. Be sure to double-check your APA formatting! (If you need to report "2", please report