International trade law gambling

In US - Gambling, the AB held that: The US violated GATS' market access requirements, but the US measure was justified under the "public morals" exception of GATS The US did not violate GATS' market access requirements because gambling services fall under the umbrella of "sporting services" The US violated GATS' market access requirements and although the US measure was justified under the "public morals" exception it did not meet the requirements of the chapeau The US did not violate GATS' market access requirements because the US measure did not explicitly mention the number of gambling services that could or could not enter the US market